<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Employment Law</title>
    <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law</link>
    <description>Employment Law</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 19:45:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-09-01T19:45:05Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Something in the Air: Is a Negative Atmosphere a Hostile Environment?</title>
      <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/something-in-the-air-is-a-negative-atmosphere-a-hostile-environment</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="Hostile Environment" height="223" src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hs-fs/hubfs/assets/htmlimages/blogs/bigstock-Businesswoman-getting-angry-at-367361239.jpg?width=335&amp;amp;height=223&amp;amp;name=bigstock-Businesswoman-getting-angry-at-367361239.jpg" style="float: left; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 20px;" width="335"&gt;Employers sometimes still grapple with the notion of what conduct supports a claim of a hostile work environment. The easy answer is generally the negative atmosphere must be sufficiently severe and pervasive, but it also must rise to the level of actual harassment of an employee or group of employees on the basis of a protected characteristic. In other words, negative workplace interactions alone aren’t enough to give rise to a hostile work environment claim without more. Recent decisions underscore this distinction enough to give employers at least a little relief over the kinds of employee conflicts that occur on a daily basis.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="Hostile Environment" height="223" src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hs-fs/hubfs/assets/htmlimages/blogs/bigstock-Businesswoman-getting-angry-at-367361239.jpg?width=335&amp;amp;height=223&amp;amp;name=bigstock-Businesswoman-getting-angry-at-367361239.jpg" style="float: left; margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 20px;" width="335"&gt;Employers sometimes still grapple with the notion of what conduct supports a claim of a hostile work environment. The easy answer is generally the negative atmosphere must be sufficiently severe and pervasive, but it also must rise to the level of actual harassment of an employee or group of employees on the basis of a protected characteristic. In other words, negative workplace interactions alone aren’t enough to give rise to a hostile work environment claim without more. Recent decisions underscore this distinction enough to give employers at least a little relief over the kinds of employee conflicts that occur on a daily basis.&lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;img src="https://track-na2.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=242325949&amp;amp;k=14&amp;amp;r=https%3A%2F%2F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%2Femployment-law%2Fsomething-in-the-air-is-a-negative-atmosphere-a-hostile-environment&amp;amp;bu=https%253A%252F%252F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%252Femployment-law&amp;amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; "&gt;</content:encoded>
      <category>Employment Discrimination Laws</category>
      <category>Title Vii Of The 1964 Civil Rights Act</category>
      <category>Workplace Discrimination</category>
      <category>Anti-Discrimination</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/something-in-the-air-is-a-negative-atmosphere-a-hostile-environment</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-08-24T05:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Cynthia L. Effinger</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Employers: ADA Protections Begin at Onboarding</title>
      <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/employers-ada-protections-begin-at-onboarding</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It’s easy to think about the Americans with Disabilities Act and its amendments as compliance matters once an employee is fully in the door. An employee requests an accommodation to perform a job, the employer initiates the interactive process, etc. With a recent federal lawsuit in &lt;em&gt;EEOC v. ALM Freight, LLC &amp;amp; LMDmax Corp., &lt;/em&gt;the EEOC is sending a very clear message about when ADA protections begin, and employers should pay close attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;It’s easy to think about the Americans with Disabilities Act and its amendments as compliance matters once an employee is fully in the door. An employee requests an accommodation to perform a job, the employer initiates the interactive process, etc. With a recent federal lawsuit in &lt;em&gt;EEOC v. ALM Freight, LLC &amp;amp; LMDmax Corp., &lt;/em&gt;the EEOC is sending a very clear message about when ADA protections begin, and employers should pay close attention.&lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;img src="https://track-na2.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=242325949&amp;amp;k=14&amp;amp;r=https%3A%2F%2F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%2Femployment-law%2Femployers-ada-protections-begin-at-onboarding&amp;amp;bu=https%253A%252F%252F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%252Femployment-law&amp;amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; "&gt;</content:encoded>
      <category>Americans With Disabilities Act ("Ada")</category>
      <category>Reasonable Accommodations</category>
      <category>Ada Amendments Act Of 2008 (“Adaaa”)</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/employers-ada-protections-begin-at-onboarding</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-08-24T05:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Cynthia L. Effinger</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS Opens the Door to “Reverse” Discrimination</title>
      <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/scotus-opens-the-door-to-reverse-discrimination</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/scotus-opens-the-door-to-reverse-discrimination" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="SCOTUS Opens the Door to “Reverse” Discrimination" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;Employers expecting good news from a largely pro-employer Supreme Court have just been dealt an unexpected headache. In a &lt;a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1039_c0n2.pdf"&gt;rare unanimous opinion&lt;/a&gt;, the United States Supreme Court opened the door a little further to claims of “reverse” discrimination in the case of &lt;em&gt;Ames V. Ohio Department of Youth Services&lt;/em&gt;. The Court removed the requirement that plaintiffs claiming reverse discrimination must prove their claims with additional background circumstances that were not required for a traditional discrimination claim.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/scotus-opens-the-door-to-reverse-discrimination" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="SCOTUS Opens the Door to “Reverse” Discrimination" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;Employers expecting good news from a largely pro-employer Supreme Court have just been dealt an unexpected headache. In a &lt;a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1039_c0n2.pdf"&gt;rare unanimous opinion&lt;/a&gt;, the United States Supreme Court opened the door a little further to claims of “reverse” discrimination in the case of &lt;em&gt;Ames V. Ohio Department of Youth Services&lt;/em&gt;. The Court removed the requirement that plaintiffs claiming reverse discrimination must prove their claims with additional background circumstances that were not required for a traditional discrimination claim.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;img src="https://track-na2.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=242325949&amp;amp;k=14&amp;amp;r=https%3A%2F%2F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%2Femployment-law%2Fscotus-opens-the-door-to-reverse-discrimination&amp;amp;bu=https%253A%252F%252F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%252Femployment-law&amp;amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; "&gt;</content:encoded>
      <category>Scotus</category>
      <category>Employment Discrimination Laws</category>
      <category>Workplace Discrimination</category>
      <category>Employment Law</category>
      <category>Employment Law For Employers</category>
      <category>Harassment And Retaliation</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/scotus-opens-the-door-to-reverse-discrimination</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-06-10T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Cynthia L. Effinger</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The DOL's Final Overtime Salary Threshold Rule is Dead in the Water</title>
      <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/dol-overtime-salary-threshold-rule-</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/dol-overtime-salary-threshold-rule-" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="The DOL's Final Overtime Salary Threshold Rule is Dead in the Water" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;Employers can now breathe a sigh of relief. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has struck down nationwide the Department of Labor's (DOL) Final Rule for raising the minimum salary threshold for employees exempt from overtime pay, also known as "white collar overtime exemption" or "EAP exemption."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/dol-overtime-salary-threshold-rule-" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="The DOL's Final Overtime Salary Threshold Rule is Dead in the Water" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;Employers can now breathe a sigh of relief. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has struck down nationwide the Department of Labor's (DOL) Final Rule for raising the minimum salary threshold for employees exempt from overtime pay, also known as "white collar overtime exemption" or "EAP exemption."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;img src="https://track-na2.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=242325949&amp;amp;k=14&amp;amp;r=https%3A%2F%2F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%2Femployment-law%2Fdol-overtime-salary-threshold-rule-&amp;amp;bu=https%253A%252F%252F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%252Femployment-law&amp;amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; "&gt;</content:encoded>
      <category>Dol</category>
      <category>Overtime</category>
      <category>Salary Threshold</category>
      <category>Overtime Exemption</category>
      <category>Fsla</category>
      <category>Fair Labor Standards Act (Flsa)</category>
      <category>Department Of Labor ("Dol")</category>
      <category>White Collar Exemption</category>
      <category>Threshold Salary</category>
      <category>Overtime Rule</category>
      <category>Salary Threshold Raised</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/dol-overtime-salary-threshold-rule-</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-12-03T05:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Cynthia L. Effinger</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FTC Ban on Noncompetes Struck Down</title>
      <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/ftc-ban-on-noncompetes-struck-down</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/ftc-ban-on-noncompetes-struck-down" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="FTC Ban on Noncompetes Struck Down" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;A Texas Court struck down the FTC's Rule banning noncompete agreements set to take effect on September 4th, 2024. The Court ruled that the FTC had overstepped its authority in implementing the Rule and further held that the Rule was overly broad because it provided no reasonable explanation for banning virtually all noncompete agreements.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/ftc-ban-on-noncompetes-struck-down" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="FTC Ban on Noncompetes Struck Down" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;A Texas Court struck down the FTC's Rule banning noncompete agreements set to take effect on September 4th, 2024. The Court ruled that the FTC had overstepped its authority in implementing the Rule and further held that the Rule was overly broad because it provided no reasonable explanation for banning virtually all noncompete agreements.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;img src="https://track-na2.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=242325949&amp;amp;k=14&amp;amp;r=https%3A%2F%2F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%2Femployment-law%2Fftc-ban-on-noncompetes-struck-down&amp;amp;bu=https%253A%252F%252F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%252Femployment-law&amp;amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; "&gt;</content:encoded>
      <category>Ftc</category>
      <category>Non-Compete Agreements</category>
      <category>Non-Compete Agreement</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/ftc-ban-on-noncompetes-struck-down</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-08-29T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Cynthia L. Effinger</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It's Official: FTC Issues Final Rule Banning Non-Competes</title>
      <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/its-official-ftc-issues-final-rule-banning-non-competes</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/its-official-ftc-issues-final-rule-banning-non-competes" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="It's Official: FTC Issues Final Rule Banning Non-Competes" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;In a stunning move the same day the Department of Labor issued a rule raising the overtime salary threshold, the &lt;a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/noncompete-rule.pdf"&gt;Federal Trade Commission issued its own long-gestating rule&lt;/a&gt; banning noncompete clauses nationwide. Employers should begin reviewing their contracts immediately to understand how this sweeping change will affect their workforce.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/its-official-ftc-issues-final-rule-banning-non-competes" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="It's Official: FTC Issues Final Rule Banning Non-Competes" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;In a stunning move the same day the Department of Labor issued a rule raising the overtime salary threshold, the &lt;a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/noncompete-rule.pdf"&gt;Federal Trade Commission issued its own long-gestating rule&lt;/a&gt; banning noncompete clauses nationwide. Employers should begin reviewing their contracts immediately to understand how this sweeping change will affect their workforce.&lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;img src="https://track-na2.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=242325949&amp;amp;k=14&amp;amp;r=https%3A%2F%2F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%2Femployment-law%2Fits-official-ftc-issues-final-rule-banning-non-competes&amp;amp;bu=https%253A%252F%252F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%252Femployment-law&amp;amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; "&gt;</content:encoded>
      <category>Ftc</category>
      <category>Federal Trade Commission</category>
      <category>Non-Compete Agreements</category>
      <category>Employment Contract</category>
      <category>Contract Terms</category>
      <category>Non-Compete Agreement</category>
      <category>Employment Law</category>
      <category>Employment Law For Employers</category>
      <category>Employment Agreement</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/its-official-ftc-issues-final-rule-banning-non-competes</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-04-25T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Cynthia L. Effinger</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dogs and Horses and…Alligators? Oh My! How to Handle Service and Support Animals in the Workplace</title>
      <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/service-and-support-animals-in-the-workplace</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/service-and-support-animals-in-the-workplace" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="Dogs and Horses and…Alligators? Oh My! How to Handle Service and Support Animals in the Workplace" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;Recently, &lt;a href="https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/38512361/support-alligator-wally-denied-entry-phillies-stadium"&gt;a Philadelphia man made news&lt;/a&gt; when he and his “emotional support alligator” were denied entrance to the Phillies stadium. That decision may seem obvious, but in recent years, issues surrounding support and service animals have become more complicated, especially in the workplace.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/service-and-support-animals-in-the-workplace" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="Dogs and Horses and…Alligators? Oh My! How to Handle Service and Support Animals in the Workplace" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;Recently, &lt;a href="https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/38512361/support-alligator-wally-denied-entry-phillies-stadium"&gt;a Philadelphia man made news&lt;/a&gt; when he and his “emotional support alligator” were denied entrance to the Phillies stadium. That decision may seem obvious, but in recent years, issues surrounding support and service animals have become more complicated, especially in the workplace.&lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;img src="https://track-na2.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=242325949&amp;amp;k=14&amp;amp;r=https%3A%2F%2F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%2Femployment-law%2Fservice-and-support-animals-in-the-workplace&amp;amp;bu=https%253A%252F%252F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%252Femployment-law&amp;amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; "&gt;</content:encoded>
      <category>Americans With Disabilities Act ("Ada")</category>
      <category>Emotional Support Animals</category>
      <category>Ada</category>
      <category>Service Animals</category>
      <category>Employment Law</category>
      <category>Employment Law For Employers</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/service-and-support-animals-in-the-workplace</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-09-29T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Jason R. Hollon</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Remodels Title VII Religious Accommodations in Groff v. DeJoy</title>
      <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/groff-v-dejoy</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/groff-v-dejoy" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="Supreme Court Remodels Title VII Religious Accommodations in Groff v. DeJoy" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;For nearly 50 years, the common test of religious accommodation from the&lt;em&gt; Hardison v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.&lt;/em&gt; case was that, if a religious accommodation required more than a &lt;em&gt;de minimis&lt;/em&gt; cost, it was asking too much of an employer under Title VII. In &lt;a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-174_k536.pdf"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Groff v. DeJoy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the Supreme Court of the United States &amp;nbsp;decided that this standard needs a reset, and employers may be in for a few changes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/groff-v-dejoy" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="Supreme Court Remodels Title VII Religious Accommodations in Groff v. DeJoy" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;For nearly 50 years, the common test of religious accommodation from the&lt;em&gt; Hardison v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.&lt;/em&gt; case was that, if a religious accommodation required more than a &lt;em&gt;de minimis&lt;/em&gt; cost, it was asking too much of an employer under Title VII. In &lt;a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-174_k536.pdf"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Groff v. DeJoy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the Supreme Court of the United States &amp;nbsp;decided that this standard needs a reset, and employers may be in for a few changes.&lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;img src="https://track-na2.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=242325949&amp;amp;k=14&amp;amp;r=https%3A%2F%2F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%2Femployment-law%2Fgroff-v-dejoy&amp;amp;bu=https%253A%252F%252F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%252Femployment-law&amp;amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; "&gt;</content:encoded>
      <category>U.S. Supreme Court</category>
      <category>Scotus</category>
      <category>Employment Discrimination Laws</category>
      <category>Title Vii</category>
      <category>Title Vii Of The 1964 Civil Rights Act</category>
      <category>Eeoc</category>
      <category>United States Supreme Court</category>
      <category>Employment Law</category>
      <category>Employment Law For Employers</category>
      <category>Reasonable Accommodations</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/groff-v-dejoy</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-06-29T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Jason R. Hollon</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Day in the Life Working from Home – What Time is Compensable?</title>
      <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/compensable-time-remote-work</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/compensable-time-remote-work" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="A Day in the Life Working from Home – What Time is Compensable?" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;Nearly three years after it suddenly became a necessity for many employees to work from home, it’s clear that teleworking isn’t going anywhere. Many employers have chosen to allow for remote or hybrid work arrangements—but in the “work from home” era, issues like timekeeping for non-exempt employees can get a little fuzzy. We’ll walk you through a teleworking employee’s day and give you the rundown on what is compensable time under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), what isn’t, and tips for making sense of it all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/compensable-time-remote-work" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="A Day in the Life Working from Home – What Time is Compensable?" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;Nearly three years after it suddenly became a necessity for many employees to work from home, it’s clear that teleworking isn’t going anywhere. Many employers have chosen to allow for remote or hybrid work arrangements—but in the “work from home” era, issues like timekeeping for non-exempt employees can get a little fuzzy. We’ll walk you through a teleworking employee’s day and give you the rundown on what is compensable time under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), what isn’t, and tips for making sense of it all.&lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;img src="https://track-na2.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=242325949&amp;amp;k=14&amp;amp;r=https%3A%2F%2F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%2Femployment-law%2Fcompensable-time-remote-work&amp;amp;bu=https%253A%252F%252F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%252Femployment-law&amp;amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; "&gt;</content:encoded>
      <category>Wage And Hour Law</category>
      <category>Non-Exempt</category>
      <category>Work-From-Home</category>
      <category>Flsa</category>
      <category>Wage And Hour</category>
      <category>Remote Work</category>
      <category>Employment Law</category>
      <category>Employment Law For Employers</category>
      <category>Fair Labor Standards Act (Flsa)</category>
      <category>Telework</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/compensable-time-remote-work</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-02-20T05:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>McBrayer PLLC</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beat the Heat with a Workplace Safety Plan</title>
      <link>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/heat-workplace-safety</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/heat-workplace-safety" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="Beat the Heat with a Workplace Safety Plan" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;This summer is proving to be another hot one in many parts of the country, which means the odds of workplace illnesses and injuries relating to excessive temperatures are much higher. In April, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) announced a &lt;a href="https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/directives/CPL_03-00-024.pdf"&gt;National Emphasis Program&lt;/a&gt; focused on addressing workplace heat hazards, which will entail OSHA conducting inspections to identify heat-related hazards in workplaces both indoors and outdoors. Employers should have a plan to avoid liability for heat-related illnesses and to be prepared should such an inspection occur.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"&gt; 
 &lt;a href="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/heat-workplace-safety" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"&gt; &lt;img src="https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/hubfs/Imported_Blog_Media/110-Aug-17-2026-04-00-20-1357-PM.png" alt="Beat the Heat with a Workplace Safety Plan" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"&gt; &lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;This summer is proving to be another hot one in many parts of the country, which means the odds of workplace illnesses and injuries relating to excessive temperatures are much higher. In April, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) announced a &lt;a href="https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/directives/CPL_03-00-024.pdf"&gt;National Emphasis Program&lt;/a&gt; focused on addressing workplace heat hazards, which will entail OSHA conducting inspections to identify heat-related hazards in workplaces both indoors and outdoors. Employers should have a plan to avoid liability for heat-related illnesses and to be prepared should such an inspection occur.&lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;img src="https://track-na2.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=242325949&amp;amp;k=14&amp;amp;r=https%3A%2F%2F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%2Femployment-law%2Fheat-workplace-safety&amp;amp;bu=https%253A%252F%252F242325949.hs-sites-na2.com%252Femployment-law&amp;amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; "&gt;</content:encoded>
      <category>Occupational Safety And Health Administration (“O</category>
      <category>Workplace Health</category>
      <category>Heat Hazards</category>
      <category>Employment Law</category>
      <category>Employment Law For Employers</category>
      <category>Osha</category>
      <category>Workplace Safety</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://242325949.hs-sites-na2.com/employment-law/heat-workplace-safety</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-06-29T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>McBrayer PLLC</dc:creator>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
