Contact Us
Categories
- Intellectual Property
- Copyright
- Trademark
- Trademarks
- Trademark Infringement
- Ai
- Data Privacy
- U.S. Patent And Trademark Office
- And Likeness
- First Amendment
- Image
- Name
- Scotus
- Trademark Protection
- United States Patent And Trademark Office (Uspto)
- Data Protection
- Name, Image, and Likeness
- Trademark Registration
- United States Supreme Court
- Brand
- Copyright License
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act
- Dmca
- Free Speech
- Lanham Act
- Music Copyright
- Ncaa
- Nil
- Privacy Law
- Publicity Rights
- Right Of Publicity
- Social Media
- Trademark Act
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Athletics
- Attorney-Client Privilege
- Audit
- Closely Held Businesses
- Computer Fraud And Abuse Act
- Contract
- Cookies
- Corporate
- Craft Distilleries
- Data Breach
- Distilleries
- E-Commerce
- Electronic Health Records (“Ehr")
- Employment Law
- European Intellectual Property Office (Euipo)
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Communications Commission (Fcc)
- First Sale Doctrine
- Ftc
- Health Insurance Portability And Accountability A
- Independent Contractors
- Irs
- KHSAA
- Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
- Kentucky Executive Order
- Likelihood Of Confusion
- Media
- Music
- Online Privacy
- Performance Rights
- Personal Information
- Personality Rights
- Piracy
- Protecting Lawful Streaming Act
- Publicity
- Recording Contract
- Should I Organize Or Incorporate
- Social Media Policies
- Technology
- Trade Secrets
- Trademark Cancelation
- Trademark Cancellation
- Trademark Search
- Work For Hire
- Works For Hire
Insights
Filtered by tag: Likelihood Of Confusion — View all
Trademark Infringement Case Gets Hotter Than Hell: Lil Nas X, Nike, and “Satan Shoes”
Lil Nas X, Trademark infringement, Satan, Shoes. These may seem like four completely unrelated items chosen entirely for their randomness, and yet all four comprise pop culture’s biggest legal story of 2021 so far. Don’t worry – if you don’t know what I’m talking about, I’ll bring you up to speed, but the short version is that a rapper, a shoe company, and the devil are involved in turning a run-of-the-mill trademark infringement case into headline-making news. The real message is that a company’s brand and trademark are defined by its willingness to aggressively defend them, and the devil isn’t always just in the details.
