Contact Us
Categories
- Intellectual Property
- Copyright
- Trademark
- Trademarks
- Trademark Infringement
- Ai
- Data Privacy
- U.S. Patent And Trademark Office
- And Likeness
- First Amendment
- Image
- Name
- Scotus
- Trademark Protection
- United States Patent And Trademark Office (Uspto)
- Data Protection
- Name, Image, and Likeness
- Trademark Registration
- United States Supreme Court
- Brand
- Copyright License
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act
- Dmca
- Free Speech
- Lanham Act
- Music Copyright
- Ncaa
- Nil
- Privacy Law
- Publicity Rights
- Right Of Publicity
- Social Media
- Trademark Act
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Athletics
- Attorney-Client Privilege
- Audit
- Closely Held Businesses
- Computer Fraud And Abuse Act
- Contract
- Cookies
- Corporate
- Craft Distilleries
- Data Breach
- Distilleries
- E-Commerce
- Electronic Health Records (“Ehr")
- Employment Law
- European Intellectual Property Office (Euipo)
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Communications Commission (Fcc)
- First Sale Doctrine
- Ftc
- Health Insurance Portability And Accountability A
- Independent Contractors
- Irs
- KHSAA
- Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
- Kentucky Executive Order
- Likelihood Of Confusion
- Media
- Music
- Online Privacy
- Performance Rights
- Personal Information
- Personality Rights
- Piracy
- Protecting Lawful Streaming Act
- Publicity
- Recording Contract
- Should I Organize Or Incorporate
- Social Media Policies
- Technology
- Trade Secrets
- Trademark Cancelation
- Trademark Cancellation
- Trademark Search
- Work For Hire
- Works For Hire
Insights
Filtered by tag: Trade Secrets — View all
Supreme Court: Bad Intent Not Enough to Violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
In an unlikely 6-3 decision where Justices Barrett, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh joined the three so-called “liberal justices,” the United States Supreme Court held on June 3, 2021, that a police officer did not violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(2) (“CFAA”), by accessing a law enforcement database to retrieve information to commit a crime. This case may have far-reaching implications for companies that provide access to trade secrets and confidential information to employees, and it’s probably time for them to review their contracts and policies.
