Contact Us
Categories
- Health Care Law
- Medicare
- Medicaid
- Affordable Care Act
- Health Insurance Portability And Accountability A
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act (“Aca”
- Electronic Protected Health Information (Ephi)
- False Claims Act
- Department Of Health And Human Services (Hhs)
- Health Information Technology For Economic And Cl
- Hospitals
- Office Of Inspector General Of The United States
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Health Insurance
- Kasper
- Physician Payments
- Hospice
- Kentucky Board Of Medical Licensure
- Accountable Care Organizations (“Aco”)
- Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services
- Compliance Programs
- Data Breach
- Department Of Health & Human Services (“HHS”)
- Electronic Health Records (“Ehr")
- Health Care Industry
- Hipaa
- Hpsa
- Licensure Requirements
- Nurse Practitioners
- Office For Civil Rights ("Ocr")
- Overpayments
- Part 2
- Pharmacists
- Substance Use Disorder
- Aprns
- Business Associate Agreements
- Business Associates
- Cabinet For Health And Family Services
- Cms
- Compliance
- Data Protection
- Denied Claims
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“Fqhcs”)
- Healthcare Provider
- Kentucky Board Of Nursing
- Kentucky’S Department For Medicaid Services
- Medical Malpractice
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Nurse Practitioners (Np)
- Office Of The Inspector General (Oig)
- Opioid Epidemic
- Part A
- Part B
- Physician Assistants
- Primary Care Physicians ("Pcps")
- Privacy Law
- Qualified Health Plan ("Qhp")
- Qui Tam
- Rural Health Centers (“Rhcs”)
- Abuse And Waste
- Affordable Care Act (ACA)
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- Appeal
- Assisted Living Facilities
- Charitable Hospitals
- Code Enforcement
- Corporate
- Cosmetology
- Cybersecurity
- DEI
- Data Privacy
- Department Of Health And Human Services' Office Of
- Department Of Justice
- Dermatology
- Division Of Regulated Child Care
- Documentation
- Drug Toxicity Report
- EMTALA
- Emergency Medical Services
- Employee Agreement
- Erisa
- Esthetic Salons
- Fair Labor Standards Act (Flsa)
- Fraud
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("Hpsa")
- Health Resource And Services Administration
- Healthcare Compliance Issues
- Healthcare Organizations
- Healthcare Providers
- Healthcare Regulation
- Hipaa Risk Assessment
- Hrsa
- Independent Clinics
- Kentucky Board Of Cosmetology
- Kentucky Board Of Pharmacy
- Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
- Licensed Practical Nurses (Lpn)
- Marijuana
- Medical Cannabis
- Medical Spas
- Medispas
- Mental Health Care
- Mid-Level Practitioner
- National Practitioners Data Bank
- Non-Physician Practitioners
- Occupational Safety And Health Administration (“O
- Opioids
- Part D
- Patient Autonomy
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Service Entities
- Protected Healthcare Information ("Phi")
- Qui Tam Suit
- Registered Nurses (Rn)
- Reverse Kasper
- Rural Health Clinic
- Stark Laws
- Telehealth
- United States Department Of Justice ("Doj")
- Whistleblower
- Workplace Health
- Workplace Safety
- Workplace Violence
Insights
When HIPAA Says Yes but Part 2 Says No, Part Three: Proactive Steps to Take If Your Program Is Under Investigation
In this three-part series, we investigate the duties of SUD providers under Part 2 in the face of subpoenas and investigations. Part One discussed the contours of the duties in the face of a subpoena, while Part Two walked you through what happens when your employees are contacted by investigators. Part Three will guide you throughout the investigatory process.
When HIPAA Says Yes but Part 2 Says No, Part Two: When Investigators Contact Your Employees
In this three-part series, we investigate the duties of SUD providers under Part 2 in the face of subpoenas and investigations. Part One discussed the contours of the duties in the face of a subpoena, while Part Two walks you through what happens when your employees are contacted by investigators.
When HIPAA Says Yes but Part 2 Says No, Part One: What SUD Providers Must Know When Responding to a Subpoena
Part 2 increases protections for SUD patient records because of the stigma and legal consequences associated with substance use treatment. Protecting patient records serves an important public health interest, because weakening confidentiality discourages patient participation in treatment. Federal courts have enforced Part 2 to protect patients. The increased privacy protection for substance use treatment was originally intended to prevent prosecution of patients in active treatment programs, and it still does. While Part 2 is not a new regulation, it did undergo major changes when the 2024 Final Rule was adopted on April 16, 2024 (with a two-year implementation period). Enforcement for the updated Part 2 rules began on February 16, 2026, when the HHS Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) launched a civil enforcement program and began accepting complaints alleging Part 2 violations and breach notification violations.
Beyond HIPAA: Legal Risks of Consumer Health Apps and Wearables for Kentucky Healthcare Providers
Patients are increasingly generating their own health data through wearables and apps, transforming how providers engage with them. However, much of this data falls outside HIPAA’s protections, creating legal gaps. With Kentucky’s Consumer Data Protection Act (KCDPA) taking effect in January 2026, these gaps will become even more complex for providers to navigate.
When Safety Nets Fail Together: Medicaid Cuts, ACA Subsidies, and EMTALA
America’s healthcare system is often described as a patchwork: a mix of public programs, private insurance, and stopgap laws meant to catch people before they fall through the cracks. But what happens when several of those safety nets are weakened or removed all at once?
New Resident Legal Issues
Leaving medical school and entering residency is a daunting transition in the career of a new physician, presenting a new set of legal rules and requirements, including employment contracts and malpractice liabilities. We recommend familiarizing yourself with your program’s relevant manuals and policies and seeking legal advice when necessary.
The Heat Turns Up: The 60-Day Rule Gets a Facelift but Changes Create Complications for Providers
With the OIG’s May 30, 2025, announcement that they are seeking $454.4 million in funding to fight healthcare fraud, healthcare providers can expect increased governmental scrutiny despite Trump’s budget cutbacks and staff layoffs. The OIG justifies its budget request by pointing out that for every $1 invested, there is an expected return of $11 in government recoveries and receivables, which fuels the Trump administration’s fight on fraud, waste, and abuse in health care. What this means for health care providers is intensified scrutiny and likely use of AI as a tool to evaluate big data to identify potential false claims, fraud, outliers, etc. Considering the OIG’s 90-page new General Compliance Guidance, healthcare providers’ self-policing strategies and internal audits are more important than ever as the heat turns up on alleged fraud and false claims.
The Future of DEI in Healthcare: Navigating Compliance and Risk Under New Federal Policies
The landscape of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in healthcare is undergoing a seismic shift following recent executive orders (EO) issued by President Donald J. Trump. The order, titled "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," aims to eliminate DEI initiatives within federal government agencies and private companies contracting with the government. This policy shift presents significant legal and operational challenges for healthcare providers, particularly those relying on federal funding.
Medical Cannabis in Kentucky: What Practitioners Need to Know
As of January 1, 2025, medical cannabis is legal in Kentucky. Physicians and nurse practitioners who want to create access for their patients to this important treatment must become authorized to certify patients for medical cannabis and should be extremely careful to comply with confusing and complex regulatory requirements.
What Kentucky Health Facilities Need to Know about Workplace Safety
Healthcare workplace violence is a recognized hazard in the healthcare industry. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in 2018 that approximately 73% of all nonfatal workplace violence injuries involved healthcare workers.[1] Even then, the incidence of workplace violence is likely higher due to underreporting.[2] Combined with the increased stress, isolation for patients and providers, and continued staffing issues and burnout, workplace violence has become one of the main contributors for healthcare workers to leave the field.[3]