Contact Us
Categories
- Health Care Law
- Medicare
- Medicaid
- Affordable Care Act
- Health Insurance Portability And Accountability A
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act (“Aca”
- Electronic Protected Health Information (Ephi)
- False Claims Act
- Department Of Health And Human Services (Hhs)
- Health Information Technology For Economic And Cl
- Hospitals
- Office Of Inspector General Of The United States
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Health Insurance
- Kasper
- Physician Payments
- Hospice
- Kentucky Board Of Medical Licensure
- Accountable Care Organizations (“Aco”)
- Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services
- Compliance Programs
- Data Breach
- Department Of Health & Human Services (“HHS”)
- Electronic Health Records (“Ehr")
- Health Care Industry
- Hipaa
- Hpsa
- Licensure Requirements
- Nurse Practitioners
- Office For Civil Rights ("Ocr")
- Overpayments
- Part 2
- Pharmacists
- Substance Use Disorder
- Aprns
- Business Associate Agreements
- Business Associates
- Cabinet For Health And Family Services
- Cms
- Compliance
- Data Protection
- Denied Claims
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“Fqhcs”)
- Healthcare Provider
- Kentucky Board Of Nursing
- Kentucky’S Department For Medicaid Services
- Medical Malpractice
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Nurse Practitioners (Np)
- Office Of The Inspector General (Oig)
- Opioid Epidemic
- Part A
- Part B
- Physician Assistants
- Primary Care Physicians ("Pcps")
- Privacy Law
- Qualified Health Plan ("Qhp")
- Qui Tam
- Rural Health Centers (“Rhcs”)
- Abuse And Waste
- Affordable Care Act (ACA)
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- Appeal
- Assisted Living Facilities
- Charitable Hospitals
- Code Enforcement
- Corporate
- Cosmetology
- Cybersecurity
- DEI
- Data Privacy
- Department Of Health And Human Services' Office Of
- Department Of Justice
- Dermatology
- Division Of Regulated Child Care
- Documentation
- Drug Toxicity Report
- EMTALA
- Emergency Medical Services
- Employee Agreement
- Erisa
- Esthetic Salons
- Fair Labor Standards Act (Flsa)
- Fraud
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("Hpsa")
- Health Resource And Services Administration
- Healthcare Compliance Issues
- Healthcare Organizations
- Healthcare Providers
- Healthcare Regulation
- Hipaa Risk Assessment
- Hrsa
- Independent Clinics
- Kentucky Board Of Cosmetology
- Kentucky Board Of Pharmacy
- Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
- Licensed Practical Nurses (Lpn)
- Marijuana
- Medical Cannabis
- Medical Spas
- Medispas
- Mental Health Care
- Mid-Level Practitioner
- National Practitioners Data Bank
- Non-Physician Practitioners
- Occupational Safety And Health Administration (“O
- Opioids
- Part D
- Patient Autonomy
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Service Entities
- Protected Healthcare Information ("Phi")
- Qui Tam Suit
- Registered Nurses (Rn)
- Reverse Kasper
- Rural Health Clinic
- Stark Laws
- Telehealth
- United States Department Of Justice ("Doj")
- Whistleblower
- Workplace Health
- Workplace Safety
- Workplace Violence
Insights
Filtered by tag: Substance Use Disorder — View all
When HIPAA Says Yes but Part 2 Says No, Part Three: Proactive Steps to Take If Your Program Is Under Investigation
In this three-part series, we investigate the duties of SUD providers under Part 2 in the face of subpoenas and investigations. Part One discussed the contours of the duties in the face of a subpoena, while Part Two walked you through what happens when your employees are contacted by investigators. Part Three will guide you throughout the investigatory process.
When HIPAA Says Yes but Part 2 Says No, Part Two: When Investigators Contact Your Employees
In this three-part series, we investigate the duties of SUD providers under Part 2 in the face of subpoenas and investigations. Part One discussed the contours of the duties in the face of a subpoena, while Part Two walks you through what happens when your employees are contacted by investigators.
When HIPAA Says Yes but Part 2 Says No, Part One: What SUD Providers Must Know When Responding to a Subpoena
Part 2 increases protections for SUD patient records because of the stigma and legal consequences associated with substance use treatment. Protecting patient records serves an important public health interest, because weakening confidentiality discourages patient participation in treatment. Federal courts have enforced Part 2 to protect patients. The increased privacy protection for substance use treatment was originally intended to prevent prosecution of patients in active treatment programs, and it still does. While Part 2 is not a new regulation, it did undergo major changes when the 2024 Final Rule was adopted on April 16, 2024 (with a two-year implementation period). Enforcement for the updated Part 2 rules began on February 16, 2026, when the HHS Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) launched a civil enforcement program and began accepting complaints alleging Part 2 violations and breach notification violations.